Page 1 of 1112345...10...Last »

Budget Forecast

Friday, December 2nd, 2011

We’re relieved to see that Minnesota is showing signs of economic recovery, and it’s good to know that we don’t face another major deficit this year. But we need to be very cautious about calling this a “surplus.”

Today’s forecast shows that Minnesota will have enough revenue to backfill the budget reserves (“rainy day funds’) that were emptied last session. That’s welcome news. But we need to remember that this forecast will be updated in February, and there is still a very real chance some or all of this additional revenue could disappear in just a few months.

This forecast makes perfectly clear that this legislature has not solved our budget deficit. They’ve simply “kicked the can down the road” until after the next election.

Rather than working with Governor Dayton on a responsible budget solution, the Republican majorities borrowed billions from our schools and spent money the state didn’t have in order to avoid making the tough decisions. The result: a $3.4 billion budget deficit looming just a year away.

This reckless borrowing scheme has already cost our state dearly. Just yesterday, we learned Minnesota schools had to borrow nearly $400 million just to make up for the money the state took from them last year. Last week, we learned the state is going to have to pay almost $600 million in interest to pay for the Republican’s tobacco appropriation bonds.

If a corporation had $876 million in the bank but owed $3 billion in outstanding debt, they wouldn’t claim they had a surplus.

Calling this a surplus is like calling yourself rich when you have $100 in your wallet but just maxed out your credit cards to pay your mortgage and buy groceries.

So now the question is: will the Republican majorities choose to leave behind a $3 billion budget deficit, or will they get to work on fixing the problem and upholding their promise of “fiscal responsibility”?

The Cost of a Shutdown

Wednesday, November 23rd, 2011

The Office of Minnesota Management and Budget released a report on the effects of the State government shutdown this past summer. Some key provisions include:

* The break in government service lasted 20 days (July 1 – July 20) making it the longest and most expansive shutdown in the state’s history.
* 80% of state spending continued during the shutdown due to court order.
* Minnesota lost $49.7 million in unrecoverable revenues.
* Preparation costs for the shutdown were approximately $7.1 million with $3 million for recovery costs.
* Approximately $65 million in payroll went unpaid by Minnesota to 19,000 laid off state employees.

Say Good Bye to the Homestead Market Value Credit

Tuesday, November 15th, 2011

When Senator Al DeKruif voted this year to eliminate your homestead credit, he sided with Republicans representing wealthy suburban districts over our rural communities. Wealthy suburbs have never benefited much from homestead credit aid, and citizens in those communities can afford to pay higher property tax bills.

Under the law changes backed by Sen. DeKruif this year, the homestead credit is replaced with something called the Market Value Homestead Exclusion. There are various explanations about how this new system will work, but the bottom line is that cities and counties will lose state aid and local taxpayers will pay more.

When discussing these changes, Sen. DeKruif has said such things as the Homestead Credit was “unreliable” and its demise has been “a long time coming.” The truth is that the legislature needed to fix a big budget deficit, and the new system saves the state money by shifting more of the state’s tax burden onto local taxpayers. For instance, Northfield loses $701,000 in direct dollar-for-dollar property tax relief from the state. This means higher local tax levies that will have to be paid for by Northfield property owners, including businesses.

Recently, the GOP has been more vocal about defending the elimination of the Homestead Market Value Credit and the creation of the new Market Value Exclusion. Most opinion articles and fliers they’ve sent out would lead the reader to believe it was nothing more than a name change. They also falsely claim that they were just doing what local officials wanted. Both are incorrect and misleading.

The GOP claim that by boosting the Property Tax Refund program (PTR) last session they negated any bad effects associated with the Homestead Credit cut. However, the PTR only received $29 million in additional funds while the Homestead Credit elimination will result in a nearly $1 billion property tax increase over the next three years.

The Republican majorities had a clear choice this past session. They could have asked the very richest Minnesotans – those making more than one million dollars a year – to pay their fair share of taxes. Instead, they chose to saddle middle-class families and seniors with a nearly $1 billion property tax increase. Republicans got exactly what they asked for this session: the very richest Minnesotans continue to pay less, and middle-class families will pay even more.

There will be an effort at the legislature next year to reinstate the Homestead Credit. It will be interesting to see if Sen. DeKruif will decide to stand with his party’s leadership on maintaining the new tax system, or if instead he will work to restore the Homestead Credit on behalf of the people who elected him.

Investing in Minnesota

Friday, October 22nd, 2010

I received a call today from a man in LeSueur.  I had knocked on his door last weekend, and he told me he was fed up with the “crap” that the Republican Party was shoving in his mailbox and that I had his vote.  He was probably referring to the negative ads citing spending for gorilla cages, polar bears, or sculpture gardens, all part of a recent capital investment bill.  While I am not inclined to acknowledge what my opponents are up to, I will gladly provide some context to this piece of legislation.

The Senate’s version of the Capital Investment Bill is developed following hundreds of meetings that are held around the state.  By the time it is heard on the Senate floor, it is a wide-ranging piece of legislation, which includes investments in public infrastructure throughout Minnesota.  While it is easy to cherry-pick one or two items out of the hundreds included in these investment packages and criticize the vote, a look at the bigger picture reveals an investment in Minnesota while preserving past investments made by our citizens.

One could vote against the Como Zoo, the Ordway Theater and the sculpture garden in Minneapolis. But to do so, one would have to also vote against millions of dollars in investment for education, the environment, health care, our veterans, and the creation of more than 10,000 jobs.  In and near my own district, the bonding bill included money for parks and trails, the Minnesota Valley Regional rail line,  correctional facilities, and the deaf and blind academies.  I staunchly support job creation via projects like these, no matter where in Minnesota they are located.

Among the hundreds of other items included in the capital investment bills were funds for the U of M, our state colleges, flood prevention, financing for infrastructure in rural Minnesota, improvements for roads and bridges, early childhood facilities, RIM (Reinvest in Minnesota), and vital dollars for our veterans homes.  The Como Zoo project alone created more than 1,000 jobs.

When this bill was heard in the full Senate, I was part of a bipartisan landslide (57 ayes, 10 nays) that voted to pass it and send it to the Governor for his approval.  The debt service on the bonds for these projects was well within the limits set to maintain our AAA bond rating as a state.  With construction costs coming in under bid, interest rates at all time lows, this was the right time to invest in Minnesota and get people back to work.

I will continue to run a positive campaign and I will continue to welcome a phone call or two from my constituents who are ready to send me back to St. Paul.  I look forward to working with them and for them.

Special Session passes Flood Relief Bill

Monday, October 18th, 2010

On September 22, 2010, heavy rain across a wide swath of Southern Minnesota caused widespread flooding and property damage across 32 counties.  Federal disaster assistance is expected to cover 75% of the losses, dependent on the damage estimates completed by officials from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, who were on site shortly after the disaster.

Residents and business leaders in the region have been quick to call for state assistance in getting this part of Minnesota on its feet again.  Most critical among the needs are road and bridge repair, school funding assistance to get displaced students back into class, and help for homeowners in need of shelter with winter fast approaching.

Also included in the legislation is language and funding to assist the North Central Minnesota community of Wadena, after a June 17, 2010 tornado caused extensive damage to a number of public facilities there, including the community center, school, and school district offices.

Officials from the House, Senate, Governor’s Office, and various state agencies have met over the course of the past week to craft a bill which provides some state assistance to help homeowners, business owners, and farmers recover, and assist communities and counties in repairing damaged infrastructure.

The bill includes $80.2 million in flood/tornado relief, and is targeted at specific agencies and areas, including public safety, transportation, natural resources, agriculture, employment and economic development, housing finance, education, and human services.  The money comes from the General Fund and some general obligation bonding dollars and trunk highway bonds.

Overall, the flood-relief sections of the bill contain $5 million from the Trunk Highway Fund, $32.5 million from the General Fund, $26 million from bond proceeds, and $10 million from the State Transportation Fund.  The $6.6 million in tornado relief comes in the form of $5.89 million from the General Fund and $750,000 from bond proceeds.

The Governor is expected to sign the bill later today.

Vote Kevin Dahle 2012