Page 1 of 1112345...10...Last »

2012 Endorsements!

Wednesday, October 17th, 2012

I am proud to be endorsed by the following organizations in my upcoming election for the Minnesota State Senate.  It is truly a great cross section of the many groups and supporters  in areas such as equality, education, working class Minnesotans, public services, safety, environment and natural resources, and health care.  I am anxious to work for all of my constituents as we take back the legislature and provide a voice for the people of this great State.

Sierra Club
Minnesota Farm Bureau
Minnesota Farmers Union PAC
Education Minnesota
MN Nurses Association
Clean Water Action
AFSCME Council 65
SEIU
MAPE
MPPOA – MN Police & Peace Officers  Association
MedPac
Planned Parenthood
NARAL
DFL
DFL Veterans Caucus
MN AFLCIO
IBEW of MN
United Transportation Union
Care Providers of MN
Outfront Minnesota
MN Professional Firefighters
Project 515
Small Business Minnesota PAC
UNITE!
Take Action MN

What’s the real story about this Brass Band Music Library?

Thursday, October 4th, 2012

As many of you know, there have been at least 4 negative mailings put out against me by something called the Freedom PAC.  A look at the donor list for this Republican PAC leads us to a long list of wealthy corporate donors intent on spreading political half-truths, inuendo, misplaced facts, and propaganda.  In many ways I thank them.  Every time they send one out, another slew of people contact me ready to support my candidacy and donate to my campaign.  “What can we do about these mailings?” they ask.  “Who can I complain to?”  “How can I donate to your campaign?” Negative campaigns promote cynicism among the electorate, give politics a bad name, and turns people away from the political process.  That is unfortunate.

Many of the mailings have claimed I voted to spend $400,000 on abrass band music library, a sculpture garden, a polar bear exhibit, or a bird atlas?  Really?  All of these projects were part of an $800 million bonding bill, eventually signed into law by then Governor Tim Pawlenty.  The State of Minnesota sells General Obligation Tax Exempt and Taxable Bonds, Revenue Bonds, the proceeds coming from the sale of General Obligation bonds that are used to pay the cost of building the capital projects that are approved by the Legislature. The Freedom PAC has cherry picked from the hundreds of infrastructure and construction projects that typically make up a bonding bill passed by every legislature in non-budget years.  Those projects are carefully vetted and chosen by the capital investment committee and typically mean hundreds of other projects are left on the committee floor.    Bonding bills are job creators, not job crushers.  Interest rates are at an all time low with constructions workers eager to work on projects that invest in Minnesota.  These investments include our public universities, our zoos, municipal buildings, structures that have regional economic impact, roads and bridges, and other public  projects.  Legislators are asked to vote the entire bonding bill up or down.  These bonding bills typically have broad bipartisan support and the debt service on the bonds make up a tiny portion of the overall state budget.

Joe Kimball of MinnPost wrote about the Brass Band Music Library several years ago.  Look for similar references to surface in campaign lit over and over again across the state over the next few weeks. His story, in the link that follows, puts things into context much better than I can.

http://www.minnpost.com/politics-policy/2008/05/pawlentys-veto-unique-music-library-hits-sour-note-chatfield

As Paul Harvey would say, now you know the rest of the story.  Happy trails to all of you!  And thanks for your support.

 Whats the real story about this Brass Band Music Library?

 

Budget Forecast

Friday, December 2nd, 2011

We’re relieved to see that Minnesota is showing signs of economic recovery, and it’s good to know that we don’t face another major deficit this year. But we need to be very cautious about calling this a “surplus.”

Today’s forecast shows that Minnesota will have enough revenue to backfill the budget reserves (“rainy day funds’) that were emptied last session. That’s welcome news. But we need to remember that this forecast will be updated in February, and there is still a very real chance some or all of this additional revenue could disappear in just a few months.

This forecast makes perfectly clear that this legislature has not solved our budget deficit. They’ve simply “kicked the can down the road” until after the next election.

Rather than working with Governor Dayton on a responsible budget solution, the Republican majorities borrowed billions from our schools and spent money the state didn’t have in order to avoid making the tough decisions. The result: a $3.4 billion budget deficit looming just a year away.

This reckless borrowing scheme has already cost our state dearly. Just yesterday, we learned Minnesota schools had to borrow nearly $400 million just to make up for the money the state took from them last year. Last week, we learned the state is going to have to pay almost $600 million in interest to pay for the Republican’s tobacco appropriation bonds.

If a corporation had $876 million in the bank but owed $3 billion in outstanding debt, they wouldn’t claim they had a surplus.

Calling this a surplus is like calling yourself rich when you have $100 in your wallet but just maxed out your credit cards to pay your mortgage and buy groceries.

So now the question is: will the Republican majorities choose to leave behind a $3 billion budget deficit, or will they get to work on fixing the problem and upholding their promise of “fiscal responsibility”?

The Cost of a Shutdown

Wednesday, November 23rd, 2011

The Office of Minnesota Management and Budget released a report on the effects of the State government shutdown this past summer. Some key provisions include:

* The break in government service lasted 20 days (July 1 – July 20) making it the longest and most expansive shutdown in the state’s history.
* 80% of state spending continued during the shutdown due to court order.
* Minnesota lost $49.7 million in unrecoverable revenues.
* Preparation costs for the shutdown were approximately $7.1 million with $3 million for recovery costs.
* Approximately $65 million in payroll went unpaid by Minnesota to 19,000 laid off state employees.

Say Good Bye to the Homestead Market Value Credit

Tuesday, November 15th, 2011

When Senator Al DeKruif voted this year to eliminate your homestead credit, he sided with Republicans representing wealthy suburban districts over our rural communities. Wealthy suburbs have never benefited much from homestead credit aid, and citizens in those communities can afford to pay higher property tax bills.

Under the law changes backed by Sen. DeKruif this year, the homestead credit is replaced with something called the Market Value Homestead Exclusion. There are various explanations about how this new system will work, but the bottom line is that cities and counties will lose state aid and local taxpayers will pay more.

When discussing these changes, Sen. DeKruif has said such things as the Homestead Credit was “unreliable” and its demise has been “a long time coming.” The truth is that the legislature needed to fix a big budget deficit, and the new system saves the state money by shifting more of the state’s tax burden onto local taxpayers. For instance, Northfield loses $701,000 in direct dollar-for-dollar property tax relief from the state. This means higher local tax levies that will have to be paid for by Northfield property owners, including businesses.

Recently, the GOP has been more vocal about defending the elimination of the Homestead Market Value Credit and the creation of the new Market Value Exclusion. Most opinion articles and fliers they’ve sent out would lead the reader to believe it was nothing more than a name change. They also falsely claim that they were just doing what local officials wanted. Both are incorrect and misleading.

The GOP claim that by boosting the Property Tax Refund program (PTR) last session they negated any bad effects associated with the Homestead Credit cut. However, the PTR only received $29 million in additional funds while the Homestead Credit elimination will result in a nearly $1 billion property tax increase over the next three years.

The Republican majorities had a clear choice this past session. They could have asked the very richest Minnesotans – those making more than one million dollars a year – to pay their fair share of taxes. Instead, they chose to saddle middle-class families and seniors with a nearly $1 billion property tax increase. Republicans got exactly what they asked for this session: the very richest Minnesotans continue to pay less, and middle-class families will pay even more.

There will be an effort at the legislature next year to reinstate the Homestead Credit. It will be interesting to see if Sen. DeKruif will decide to stand with his party’s leadership on maintaining the new tax system, or if instead he will work to restore the Homestead Credit on behalf of the people who elected him.

Vote Kevin Dahle 2012