Page 20 of 42« First...10...1819202122...3040...Last »

Lonsdale
Published On: 21st April 2009 | Published By: Kevin Dahle For Senate

lonsdale image LonsdaleYesterday, I stopped by the Lonsdale city hall to visit with the Mayor, Tim Rud and city administrator Joel Erickson. Representative Bly and I both spent some time with our friends to the west to talk about local issues.

Lonsdale has a lot of good things happening right now. They are anticipating opening a new care facility for assisted living as the Northfield Three Links Care Center expands there and they eagerly await the opening of a new municipal library set to open its doors this fall. Both facilities are a great addition to the community.

Recently, a federal grant request was submitted to the state hoping to acquire about $35,000 from the Library Services and Technology Grant. Surprisingly and unfortunately that grant request was denied. We will be asking the grant committee to reconsider the request and awarding of funds which would be used for books and getting books programmed into the SELCO (Southeast Library Coop) system. The Northfield Library has been very helpful in assisting the Lonsdale library in getting started and have been a good resource in helping Rep. Bly and I understand the grant process a little more clearly.

We also talked in general terms about the effects of LGA cuts to the city budget and about possible federal stimulus dollars that may find their way to Lonsdale in the way of commercial development improvements or aging downtown infrastructure replacement. While there are no specific plans in place, my office will be forwarding all state and federal contact information regarding the use of stimulus funds to the city administrator.

While many small towns continue to struggle in a tough economy, Lonsdale continues to look for ways to develop and improve a plan for growth they have put in place over the last several years. I look forward to working with the Lonsdale leaders and of course will do whatever I can to help them achieve those goals.



Education Budget
Published On: 15th April 2009 | Published By: Kevin Dahle For Senate

The Senate Education bill passed off the Senate floor last week. The Senate bill differs from the House and the Governor’s education bill because it makes some cuts to education.
Why would the Senate approve a bill that cuts education? The state has a $6.4 billion deficit. Education makes up 40% of the state’s budget. Holding education harmless means even greater cuts to health and human services, local government aid, higher education, public safety and the courts. The Senate bill does not rely on accounting shifts or delayed payments to schools. Payment shifts have to be paid back. They serve as a short term solution to a long term budget problem. The Governor and House plans both employ shifts, and the House proposal has an unprecedented $1.7 billion in delayed payments.
Federal stimulus dollars will soften the blow. A 7% cut, in reality, will be closer to a 1-3% cut as federal money flows directly to schools, primarily in areas of special education and Title 1 programs. Some school districts will actually receive more federal dollars this biennium than they will lose in cuts. The Senate bill does not make cuts to special education or early childhood education. Pre-kindergarten allowance programs will actually expand and see increased funding. In addition, the Senate bill allows schools to access capital reserves, staff development set-asides, and other dedicated funds as a flexible option to replace lost general fund dollars.
In the overall state budget, the Senate cuts more than the House or the Governor. It does not rely on budget shifts or borrowing gimmicks. These calculated cuts are also based on an additional $2.2 billion in new revenue, a concept the Governor flatly rejects. Failure to raise additional revenue means even larger cuts to education, our hospitals, nursing homes, and other areas of the health care budget.
The Governor’s education increases support expanding Q-Comp, the alternative teacher pay for performance program… an unproven program with questionable results currently in place in less than a third of Minnesota schools. None of that money would reach the classroom directly.
I am absolutely opposed to the idea of making cuts to education. These cuts are not permanent. But we face an unprecedented economic crisis that requires shared sacrifice. If we make tough decisions now by crafting a balanced budget, as the economy improves we can reinvest in our schools and our most precious asset, our children.
What will the final education bill look like? That remains to be seen. But the House, Senate, and Governor will need to find a way to work together, find a responsible balanced budget, and collectively share in that sacrifice while making tough decisions now.



Mid-Session Update
Published On: 9th April 2009 | Published By: Kevin Dahle For Senate

seal Mid Session UpdateThe 2009 Legislative Session is at its mid-point and the Legislature continues work to finish the job of balancing the state’s budget before the constitutionally mandated deadline in May. The Senate and House set their budget targets earlier this year than any year in recent memory, and the Legislature is positioned to finish this session on time, with a budget that is balanced and fair to Minnesotans.
To address the financial crisis affecting the state, the Senate DFL has taken the fiscally responsible approach to solving the state’s $6.4 billion budget deficit. The Senate’s proportional solution is the fairest and most equitable of the plans put forward to deal with the deficit, and it best positions the state for new investments once the economic storm is weathered. Additionally, unlike the Governor’s proposal that leaves the state $2.6 billion in deficit in 20011, the Senate solution provides for a balanced budget for the state through 2013.
The plan calls for a 7% proportional cut for each of the budget areas; however, those reductions are softened by federal funds in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 in key areas, including education, public safety, and health care. Reductions in education are further eased by the elimination of several mandates that will free up resources to allow school districts to reinvest those dollars back into the classroom.
While balancing the budget is the primary focus of this session, the Legislature is also moving forward on many issues of importance to Minnesotans. Several bills that address a variety of issues have already been signed into law the Governor. Those bills extend unemployment benefits, ensure that any budget passed by the Legislature and enacted by the Governor be balanced for the long term, and provide tax relief to Minnesotans. The Senate has passed several bills to create jobs in the state, including a bonding bill with a focus on creating jobs now by fixing the state’s infrastructure and investing in flood mitigation. A Mandate Reduction Bill designed to eliminate duplicative or unnecessary government regulations has also passed the body.
There is still much to be done in the 2009 Legislative Session and cooperation has never been more important to our state as we face unprecedented difficulties. The Senate will continue its bipartisan tradition and collaborate with the House and the Governor to guide our state through the rough times ahead and to a stronger and more prosperous future for all of us.



Whose Priority?
Published On: 28th March 2009 | Published By: Kevin Dahle For Senate

bullying Whose Priority?A recent newspaper editorial criticized a legislative committee for taking up a bill which further defines bullying in the public schools. The bill (SF971) would require school boards to develop policy for training educators on dealing with bullying, reporting such instances, and for instituting disciplinary action should it happen. The final sentence of the editorial wondered why, with a multi-billion dollar deficit, we would be discussing these types of issues.
While the budget crisis is real, rest assured, each finance and tax committee continues to work on a budget with a long term solution as our goal. Each week we discuss the budget through caucus or committee meetings, with local government officials, interest groups, and with constituents. But policy bills will continue to be on the table as well.
Bills like SF971 are not a trivial issue to those affected. It is not a trivial issue to the teen who quits school because they are victims of bullying and harassment. It is not a trivial issue to the openly gay teen who experiences abuse and intimidation on a daily basis. This legislation did not seem trivial to the testifier who shared the fact they had suicidal thoughts because of how insecure they felt in their particular school setting.
Quite often, an idea can take several years before it comes to the Capitol in bill form. Stakeholders meet over time to try to created good legislation or make improvements on existing law. A committee can kill a bill one year, but an improved policy bill can make headway the following year.
The budget remains our biggest concern at the legislature. But our citizens may have more personal concerns besides the budget, whether it involves health care, unemployment, foreclosure, consumer protection, college tuition, eminent domain, child safety, crime, or the quality of one’s education.
Minnesota citizens care about quality of life issues and often they turn to the legislature to meet those needs or perhaps as a last resort. They really help set our agenda. To turn them away or ignore their concerns would be a poor way to legislate.



Lows and Highs
Published On: 21st March 2009 | Published By: Kevin Dahle For Senate

a 175x116 Lows and HighsThis was the week of highs and lows. I had a great bill up in the Commerce Committee on Tuesday that would have brought some badly needed oversight to the Payday Lending industry. So many good people worked on this bill since the last session, only to see it go down in flames on Tuesday. The bill would have allowed consumers to get three payday (short term) loans within a 6 month period. Inquiry into a fourth loan would have triggered a conventional loan allowing the consumer to pay off any debt in installments at much more reasonable interest rates. Payday loans are a booming industry where consumers find themselves caught in a debt trap that tends to spiral out of control. This bill would have offered an escape route for costumers beholden to an industry that is growing across the United States at an alarming rate. I feel I was on the right side of this issue. Unfortunately, fellow committee members did not agree.
On Thursday I presented a bill that attempt to level the playing field in eminent domain cases. Farmers and residents in the northern part of District 25 are up against CapX2020, a Public Utilities transmission line project that runs across Minnesota. In 2006, the Minnesota legislature enacted some changes to eminent domain laws that included several positive steps in trying to bring fairness and protections to property owners. Not only did they set the rules on the use of eminent domain for redevelopment activity, but they also tried to curb abusive practices that gave an unfair advantage to the condemning authority. While the law applies to cities, counties, and state governments…oddly, the law exempted Public Utilities. One of my testifiers shared his recent financial and emotional difficulties in negotiating with those Utility companies. This bill, SF1112, seeks to remove those exemptions. After some tough questioning and passionate testimony, the bill passed the Judiciary Committee.
Also on Thursday, I was allowed to chair the Education Committee. This was my first chance to hold the gavel and lead the discussion on a couple of bills. The last bill, involving an alternative teacher licensure plan, passed on a voice vote just before we adjourned before session.
It was a busy week with plenty of late nights as each committee tries to move policy bills before the March 27 deadline. Some bills will continue on while others fade away, leaving plenty of time for more highs and lows.



Vote Kevin Dahle 2012